Chapter 48, “How God wants you to serve him
physically and spiritually, how he rewards both, and how he helps you discern
between good and evil spiritual delights during contemplation” (107-108)
In Chapter 47, Anonymous urged us to hide our
desire for God when it becomes the least bit of an opportunity to show off our
contemplative or pious self; any such self-pointing preening comes dangerously
close to subtle egotistical posturing. Rather than making a show of your spirituality
(by singing, for example, “O, How I Love Jesus!”), it’s better to play
hide-and-seek with God, better to hide one’s self and let God seek and find you
as He loves to do. Anonymous, of course,
is aware that this sounds a bit silly, as though he’s “lacking in sense,” but
he has his reasons.
Here it will help if we
once more remember what Anonymous has observed before we move to the Chapter
48. You may wish to hide yourself for
three reasons. First, when you hide your
longing for God (from others), God finds you all the more quickly. “He sees the yearning you hide more clearly
than what you bare, and your desire is fulfilled more quickly” (107). Second, when you “conceal what you wish,”
then you learn how to “wean yourself from a dependence on your fragile, fickle
human emotions and deepen the purity of your spiritual awareness.”
Here’s
the sort of thing that Anonymous is talking about. I remember, on Sunday morning in a Miami
hotel, turning on
the television before going to a neighborhood church for the
Eucharist. It was a “religious” program
conducted by a popular televangelist. All the standard props were used: a large
choir electronically enhanced, a stage filled with flowers, attractive women
modestly but expensively clothed, and an overenthusiastic preacher who strode
back and forth across the stage waving his Bible. I quickly became absorbed in the theatrics
and found myself emotionally responding to the enthusiasm of the preacher and
his audience. It took a few minutes
before the horror of his message penetrated through to my critical
understanding. With all the panoply of
“popular” religion, choir, Bibles, church robes, and the
like, the man was extolling the amassing of money and material goods as a sign
of God’s favor and promising them to his audience in great abundance, if they
would donate heavily into his ministry. I was momentarily lost in the externals. My emotions were responding, but not my mind. Many were and are taken in by this kind of
ersatz religion. Unless they get an emotional charge from such choreographed worship, they feel let down. God has disappointed them. But if they get charged up, then God is there, and they can tell others how terrific the choir was, how powerful the preacher was, how terrific the music was. It was a great experience. But God is not an experience, just as he is not one of our thoughts, nor one of our emotional responses.
[A wee aside for those of us who worship in liturgical communities: always remember that liturgical churches--Lutheran, Episcopal, Roman Catholic, Orthodox--are also prone to providing us with spectacularly lovely and emotionally delightful experiences. There is nothing inherently "wrong" with beautiful liturgical worship; nevertheless contemplatives keep themselves aware that the liturgical in some churches may be a source of subtle pride. Thomas Merton, as he notes in The Inner Experience often found monastic worship an embarrassment.]
When you become
aware of emotional attachments and avoid them because they are spiritually
dangerous, then God “helps you tied the spiritual knot of burning love between
you and God in a mystical oneness of wills.”
Here’s
the third reason: God bonds himself with you more deeply than any of your five
senses—taste, touch, feeling, hearing, and seeing—can make way or provide access
for him. After all, God and you are capable
of deeply profound spiritually union.
That
having been said, we are ready for Chapter 48 wherein our teacher, always
seeking balance and centeredness, says that he’s “not trying to discourage [us]
from praying aloud. And I don’t want
[anyone] to feel that [she or he] can’t burst into words when your spirit fills
to overflowing and you’re moved to talk to God as you would to a friend, saying
things like, ‘Good Jesus! Lovely
Jesus! Sweet Jesus!’ and others.” Anonymous has no intention of separating body
and spirit. God can indeed “set [our]
senses on fire, not just once or twice in this life, but sometimes quite often,
whenever he wishes.” What’s important is
to know how the fire is started. If the
flames arrive from blowtorches “you can’t identify,” watch out. If you are being manipulated, watch out. Welcome the sources of your comfort when they
are “devout stirring[s] of love making [their] home in the pure heart, created
by the hand of almighty God, without any intermediary.
Anonymous
closes down this chapter by suggesting that, if you have trouble making
discernments as to the origins of your stirrings, you may wish to consult
“another man’s book, where it’s described a thousand times better than I ever
could” (110). As Carmen Butcher notes,
Anonymous is most like referring to The Scale of Perfection by Walter
Hilton, a fourteenth-century colleague who practiced and taught contemplative
prayer. Here is an excerpt from Book I,
47, of The Scale that reinforces what Anonymous teaches:
If you seek wisdom (who is
Jesus) as silver and gold, and delve deep after it, you shall find it. You will have to delve deep in your heart—for
there it is hidden—and thoroughly turn out all the loves and pleasures, sorrows and fears of all earthly things: and
so you will find wisdom—Jesus.
In other words, go into
yourself where Jesus is. All of
which is what Richard Rohr once said:
One of the major problems in the spiritual life is our attachment to our own self-image—either positively or negatively created. We confuse this idea of ourselves with who we actually are in God. Our ideas about things are not the things in themselves. Concepts of themselves are not immediate contact with reality.
Who we are, and forever will be, in God, is a much more enduring and solid foundation. As Paul says, in my paraphrase, I no longer live as a mere “I,” but Christ lives in me and I live in Christ (Galatians 2:20). God always sees his son, Jesus, in me, and cannot not love him (see John 17:22-23). What the Gospel promises us is that we are objectively and inherently children of God (see 1 John 3:2).
This is not a moral worthiness that we attain; it is ontological,[1] metaphysical, and substantial worthiness, and cannot be gained or lost. When this given God-image becomes our self-image, we are home free, and the Gospel is just about the best good news that we can hope for! (Adapted from Preparing for Christmas with Richard Rohr, pp. 43-44)
[1]
The word “ontological” comes from the Greek word for “being” or the
“isness” of something or someone. In the
Christ Icon, behind the head of Christ is a nimbus or halo
bearing within it a Cross, which is inscribed with the Greek words "I
AM." That is the mysterious name of God revealed in Exodus 3:14,
"I AM WHO I AM." The name of God tells us who He is. He is Being, beyond our words for
things. Some say it this way: if we must
use the word “God” for Being, then perhaps it’s best to say that what we mean “God
beyond the word ‘God’.” It’s the God
beyond God with whom we have
relationship in contemplative prayer. In
Centering Prayer we have a relationship with the great I AM within us, none
other than the Christ-within-me.
No comments:
Post a Comment